Crypto lawyer John Deaton justifies holding BTC, ETH while representing XRP holders


 381 total views

The XRP community has been eagerly – or anxiously – anticipating the day the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs resumes in 2022. Though scheduled to be around 19 January, XRP-investors are already gearing up to make sure their voices are heard.

Crypto lawyer John Deaton, who is representing more than 50,000 XRP-holders during the lawsuit, has become a familiar presence in the space. However, an admission on Twitter caught many of his own followers by surprise.

A top three reunion

In a Twitter thread where he was discussing his goals for the SEC vs Ripple case, Deaton reminded people that he also held Bitcoin and Ether.

Naturally, this came as a shock to many, as one burning issue during the case has been the question of whether or not senior SEC officials had exchanges with stakeholders related to Ethereum that would have constituted a conflict of interest.

For his part, Deaton pointed out the difference between Ether the asset and Ethereum-linked individuals. He said,

“Some of you have DM’d me saying you appreciate my efforts but you are disappointed in me because I haven’t sold my #ETH based on what we’ve learned. Judge Castel, in Telegram, said it best: Cryptocurrencies and digital assets are simply “alphanumeric code.” “

He added,

But what we DO NOT want is for the SEC to simply try to publicly cover it’s ass and serve the @ethereum Foundation and @ConsenSys or @VitalikButerin or @ethereumJoseph with subpoenas so that @GaryGensler can claim he’s being fair.”

Deaton stressed that his goal was regulatory clarity, in order to get a judge’s ruling that XRP was not a security.

United we stand, divided we…

Earlier, Deaton had reminded his audience that it was dangerous to turn the SEC lawsuit into a case of Ether vs XRP. The crypto lawyer noted that a victory for Ripple would benefit alt coins as a whole, and help make it easier for the next company in court to confront the SEC.

Making a big “Fife”

On 6 January, the SEC submitted a filing that used the outcome of another case in order to strengthen its own pending motion to strike Ripple’ Fair Notice Defense. The move ignited a firestorm of reactions as XRP-holders tried to guess how the results of the case between the SEC and John M. Fife might affect Ripple’s own defense in the coming weeks.

Adblock test (Why?)

Disclaimer: does not endorse any content or product on this page. While we aim at providing you all important information that we could obtain, readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company and carry full responsibility for their decisions, nor can this article be considered as investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.