Fed rate cuts and global liquidity are seen as positive for Bitcoin, but some experts argue their impact is overstated- Here’s why

Fed rate cuts and global liquidity are seen as positive for Bitcoin, but some experts argue their impact is overstated- Here’s why

Loading

Key Points

  • Analysts are skeptical about the positive impact of Fed rate cuts on Bitcoin.
  • Andrew Kang suggests Bitcoin might remain range-bound without a significant crypto catalyst.
  • Market optimism exists for Bitcoin’s potential surge in Q4 2024 due to Fed rate cuts and China’s stimulus package.
  • Fed rate cuts and global liquidity are seen as positive for Bitcoin, but some experts argue their impact is overstated.
  • China’s stimulus is viewed as more beneficial for stocks than for crypto.

Market Optimism and Fed Rate Cuts

There is a prevailing sense of optimism in the market that Bitcoin (BTC) could see a significant surge in Q4 2024. This sentiment is largely driven by the ongoing U.S. Federal Reserve rate cuts and a substantial stimulus package from China. These factors are generally perceived as positive for global liquidity and risk assets, including Bitcoin. The aggressive 50 basis points (bps) rate cut by the Fed in September was seen as a key catalyst, propelling Bitcoin to a high of $66,000.

However, not everyone shares this optimistic view. Andrew Kang, co-founder of Mechanism Capital, has expressed a more cautious and contrarian perspective. He believes that the impact of the Fed rate cuts and China’s policy measures might be overstated. According to Kang, while these factors do influence global liquidity, they are just one part of a much larger puzzle that affects crypto prices.

Contrarian Views on Fed Rate Cuts

Kang argues that the market participants have exaggerated the significance of the Fed rate cuts. He points out that Bitcoin’s price movements have shown little correlation with Fed rates in the past. For instance, Bitcoin experienced a 4.5x rally during a period when Fed rates were at multi-decade highs, suggesting that other factors were at play. Kang believes that expecting a strong inverse correlation between Bitcoin prices and Fed rate cuts is unrealistic.

Supporting Kang’s view, SwissOne Capital, a crypto-focused asset manager, noted that altcoins tend to benefit more than Bitcoin during Fed rate cut cycles. Historically, Bitcoin’s dominance has declined during such periods. For example, during the previous rate-cutting cycle that began in mid-2019, Bitcoin’s dominance fell to 38%.

China’s Stimulus and Its Impact

Kang also highlighted that China’s stimulus measures are more bullish for the stock market than for crypto. He cited recent trading discounts between USDT and the Chinese Yuan (CNY) as evidence. Since the announcement of the Chinese stimulus, USDT has traded at a discount to CNY, indicating a shift in investor preference from crypto to stocks. This trend suggests that Chinese investors might be reallocating their capital to the stock market, which could limit the positive impact of the stimulus on Bitcoin.

Despite a temporary stall in the Chinese stock rally, market analysts predict that additional stimulus from the Chinese government could reignite the uptrend. If this happens, it could further divert investment from crypto to stocks, reinforcing Kang’s argument.

Bitcoin’s Price Range and Future Catalysts

Kang predicts that Bitcoin could remain range-bound between $50,000 and $72,000 until a significant crypto-specific catalyst emerges. He emphasizes that his stance is not bearish but rather cautious. He believes that the market has overestimated the impact of macroeconomic factors like Fed rate cuts and China’s stimulus on Bitcoin’s price.

In the meantime, Bitcoin remains below its 200-day moving average (MA), a key technical indicator. This suggests that Bitcoin has yet to establish a convincing bullish market structure. Until it breaks above this level, the market may continue to see Bitcoin trading within the predicted range.

Conclusion

While there is optimism about Bitcoin’s potential surge in Q4 2024, driven by Fed rate cuts and China’s stimulus package, some experts urge caution. Andrew Kang and SwissOne Capital highlight that the impact of these macroeconomic factors might be overstated. They suggest that Bitcoin could remain range-bound until a significant crypto-specific catalyst emerges. Investors should consider these perspectives and remain vigilant about the broader market dynamics.